Overcoming "Sole-Source" Hospital Contracts

How to sell to a hospital with an exclusive contract with a competitor

Nothing stalls your sales team’s momentum like learning the hospital is locked into an exclusive contract with your competitor. However, exclusivity does not have to stall out your sales process. Most GPO agreements have built-in flexibility to ensure providers can access the best technology for their patients.

Here is how you can find those areas of flexibility to help your hospital partners and device advocates move your sales process forward.

1. Identify the "Clinical Necessity" Clause

Most hospital contracts include a provision for Physician Preference. If a clinician identifies that your device provides a specific clinical benefit or addresses a safety gap that the incumbent lacks, the hospital can usually bypass exclusivity.

• Your Strategy: Equip your champions with a Clinical Justification Template.

• The Result: You make it effortless for them to document why your tech is necessary for specific patient outcomes, turning an administrative hurdle into a clinical requirement.

• 
  

2. Focus on "Total Cost of Care"

Administrators often stay with sole-source providers to protect volume-based rebates. You must help them see the bigger picture. If your technology reduces a patient’s stay or lowers the risk of common complications, those savings usually dwarf a 3% GPO rebate.

• Your Strategy: Provide a Value Comparison for the CFO.

• The Result: You shift the conversation from "price per unit" to "hospital efficiency," proving that your technology actually protects their bottom line.

  
  

3. Propose a "Limited Innovation Pilot"

Instead of requesting a full contract change, propose a small-scale evaluation. Most systems have "Research and Education" or "Innovation" budgets that are exempt from standard GPO restrictions.

• Your Strategy: Suggest a 30-day pilot or a single-department evaluation.

• The Result: Once the team experiences the clinical and operational benefits firsthand, the internal dialogue shifts from "Should we let them in?" to "How do we keep this here?"

  
  

4. Leverage New Reimbursement Pathways

If your technology has a new CPT code, NTAP, or TPT status, it often sits in its own financial category. These specific reimbursement pathways allow the hospital to view your technology as a new service line rather than a competitor to an existing contract. You are providing a clinical capability that the hospital didn't have before.

• Your Strategy: Map your tech specifically to the hospital’s current billing landscape.

• The Result: The hospital views you as a revenue partner rather than a contract complication.

5. Clear the Value Analysis Committee (VAC)

The VAC is the gatekeeper of the "exclusive" environment. They need to justify any exception to the contract with data that balances clinical need against financial risk.

• Your Strategy: Provide a VAC Submission Kit that pre-packages the clinical evidence and financial impact.

• The Result: You simplify their decision-making process, giving them the exact documentation they need to approve your technology as a necessary exception.

  
  

Closing the Gap Between Product and Placement

Success in a sole-source environment requires a shift from traditional selling to strategic problem-solving. When you equip your team with the right clinical justifications and financial models, you stop fighting the contract and start addressing the hospital's broader operational goals. By positioning your technology as a solution for patient outcomes and fiscal efficiency, you transform from a vendor into an essential partner in the hospital’s mission.

Partner with Borrowed Pen

The complexities of MedTech commercialization require more than just good copy. It requires deep industry fluency. Borrowed Pen delivers FDA-compliant content, high-impact sales enablement, and comprehensive GTM strategies specifically for medical device companies.

We leverage years of internal experience across development, manufacturing, and clinical practice to build strategies that resonate with decision makers and buying committees. Whether you are launching a breakthrough or fighting for market share in a locked system, we provide the strategic assets you need to win.

Ready to unlock the hospital system and move your sales process forward? 

Book a call with us today.

-----Continue reading for sale enablement templates-----

Clinical Justification Template

Empowers your clinical champions to formally request an exception based on "Physician Preference" by identifying specific gaps in the incumbent's technology.

To: Value Analysis Committee / Supply Chain Management

From: [Physician Name/Department]

Date: [Date]

Subject: Clinical Justification for [Product Name]

Requested Technology: [Product Name] 

Current Contracted Equivalent: [Competitor Product Name]

Clinical Rationale for Exception:

The currently contracted device is insufficient for the following patient populations or clinical scenarios:

• Specific Clinical Gap: [e.g., Lack of certain sizing, inferior material, or lack of specific safety feature].

• Patient Outcome Impact: [Product Name] provides [Specific Benefit, e.g., 20% reduction in trauma to the site], which is not achievable with the incumbent technology.

• Safety/Risk Mitigation: Use of the requested technology is expected to reduce the risk of [Specific Complication], a known risk factor with the current standard of care.

Physician Declaration:

As the treating physician, I have determined that [Product Name] is clinically necessary to provide the standard of medical care required for my patients. The unique features of this technology directly impact procedural success and patient recovery in ways the contracted alternative cannot.

Signature: _______________________________________________________________

Value Comparison (CFO Summary)

Recontextualizes the financial conversation by weighing unit price against long-term operational savings and improved patient throughput.

Economic Impact Analysis: [Product Name]

Metric	Incumbent Technology	[Product Name]	Hospital Impact
Contract Status	Sole-Source (GPO)	Non-Contract Exception	N/A
Unit Price	$[Lower Price]	$[Higher Price]	+ $[Difference] per unit
GPO Rebate (Est)	3%	0%	- $[Rebate Amount]
Avg. Length of Stay	[X] Days	[X - 0.5] Days	Saved: $[Hospital Day Rate x 0.5]
Complication Rate	[X]%	[Lower X]%	Saved: $[Cost of Complication Treatment]
Net Financial Impact	Standard Cost	Enhanced Efficiency	Total Net Savings: $[Final Amount]

Executive Summary: While the incumbent device offers a volume-based rebate, the operational efficiencies gained through [Specific Feature] result in a net positive impact on the hospital’s bottom line. The cost of a single prevented complication or a half-day reduction in length of stay outweighs the annual GPO rebate for this category.

Value Analysis Committee (VAC) Submission Checklist

Streamlines the committee’s decision-making process by pre-packaging the clinical evidence and financial data required to approve a contract exception.

Preparing for the VAC: A Checklist for Success

▢ Clinical Evidence Packet: Include at least two peer-reviewed studies or white papers demonstrating superior outcomes associated with the technology.

▢ Completed Clinical Justification: Ensure a Department Chair or influential high-volume user signs the template.

▢ Cross-Departmental Support: Identify whether the technology benefits other departments (e.g., does the device reduce clinical staff's workload?).

▢ Reimbursement Strategy: Clearly state the CPT codes or any NTAP/TPT status. If it is a "pass-through" cost, highlight that it does not impact the existing DRG payment.

▢ Operational Implementation Plan: Confirm that the technology requires minimal staff retraining or that the manufacturer provides training at no cost.

▢ Standardization Impact: Briefly explain why this exception will not lead to "uncontrolled" spend, but rather a targeted solution for a specific patient cohort.